When I initially
heard about Warner Bros. announcement of their new choice for Batman, I was
confused and unhappy, but is this really such a bad decision after all?
Casting a
superhero is, and always will be, one of the most difficult jobs for these big
films. No matter what, there will always be some fanboy in his basement on his
laptop writing angry blog posts about it, because everyone has a different idea
of how this character should look. In fact, casting comic book characters is
even harder than casting book characters. In a book, both too much and too
little description of what a character looks like can make it easier for those
in charge of casting, because they either have a set look in mind, or are forced
to create their own.
With iconic comic
book characters, things are a little different. New 52 Batman looks different
from Killing Joke Batman, or The Long Halloween Batman, so instead of
one great description or one open-ended appearance, there are literally
hundreds of different versions of the character to choose from.
It seems that the
general consensus towards the choice of Ben Affleck is negative, but I think
that people need to think back to the previous casting decisions when it comes
to Batman before looking forward, because it just might change their point of
view on the issue.
The main issue
plaguing Affleck is that people know him as a comedy guy. His film Argo just won an Oscar, and The Town was no doubt a fantastic drama,
but that doesn’t wipe away fond memories of Dogma
or Mallrats. Along with that, his
first adventure into the world of superhero films was, unfortunately, Daredevil, which is universally known as
one of the worst superhero films out there.
Thinking of Ben
Affleck as a comedy guy isn’t necessarily the biggest problem when it comes to
the type of actor he is. People want a badass, tough Batman, and we’ve yet to
see Affleck play a real badass character, but that doesn’t mean he can’t do it.
Before The Dark Knight, Heath Ledger
was mostly known for his role in the very mediocre A Knight’s Tale or his part in the romantic comedy 10 Things I Hate About You. And yet,
despite these previous roles, Ledger put on the most haunting, resonating
performance in the entire history of comic book films. His portrayal of the
Joker has changed not only the films, but also the comics themselves, with DC’s
New 52 Joker showing his very obvious influence.
As for Daredevil, everyone is entitled to a bad
film. Hugh Jackman’s performance in X-Men
Origins: Wolverine didn’t change the general consensus of his ability to
act, or more specifically, play Wolverine. Chris Evans’ role as The Human Torch
in the painfully bad Fantastic Four films
didn’t have people up-in-arms over his performance as Captain America.
The reason people
are so gung ho about hating Affleck is because Batman is the
“cool” hero to
like right now, and all anyone knows is Bale. It’s hard not to sound like an
elitist when saying this, but there are plenty of Batman “fans” out there who
don’t even know who Thomas and Martha Wayne are, so are these really the people
whose opinions should be taken seriously? We are all so comfortable with the
Christian Bale Batman because his films with Christopher Nolan are what helped
bring Batman back to the top, so maybe it’s time to shake things up a bit.
Casting Ben
Affleck as Batman could mean some very important things for the Dark Knight. First
of all, this most likely means that the Nolanverse Batman will be ignored, and
that those films will be treated like an Elseworlds story. This means that the
story does not affect or influence the main continuity of the character, and is
accepted as taking place within it’s own, self-contained universe separate from
the DC universe. For example, Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns and Alex Ross & Mark Waid’s Kingdom Come. This is great because it
means that we won’t hear Nolan whining about how they’re ruining his character,
and we get a brand new take on Batman. Christopher Nolan’s Batman story is said
and done, and should remain that way, and casting a brand new Batman hopefully
means that they will respect this in Superman/Batman.
This also means
that the foundations of the Justice League can finally be laid down, to prepare
for that film, much like how Marvel was able to begin the groundwork for the Avengers with the first Iron Man movie. Iron Man ignored all previous Marvel films and marked the very
beginning of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, as we know it today.
The second thing
that is great about this reboot of the Batman character is that perhaps we can
finally leave the realism to the real world, and make a true comic book film. People
have begun to love the gritty, realistic superhero films, but that isn’t what
the characters are really about. Christopher Nolan’s Batman could never exist
in a world that also knows about Superman. It just wouldn’t make sense within
the context of the Nolan films. Director Zack Snyder has stated that the film
will draw influence from The Dark Knight
Returns, in which Superman and Batman fight, plus it has been revealed that
some alleged
titles are Superman vs
Batman or Batman vs Superman (very
creative choices). Christopher Nolan’s Batman is neither strong enough nor
smart enough to take on Man of Steel’s
Superman. He’d be utterly embarrassed. So maybe, with Affleck’s Batman, they’ll
create a tougher, more intelligent Batman who actually stands a chance against
the godlike power of Superman.
While this is all
a matter of opinion, myself and many others are guilty of immediately looking
at the casting of Ben Affleck in a negative way because he didn’t initially
conjure up images of the Dark Knight we all know and love without really giving
him a chance. While it may take some work, and some faith from the fans, Ben
Affleck could become a bigger, better Batman than the hyper-realism brought to
the character by Christian Bale and Christopher Nolan. Only time will tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment